USPTO serial 74301250
POWERGRIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CONN, WILLIAM A.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POWERGRIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | (a) garden tools; namely, trowels, rakes, shovels, and hoes; (b) general hand tools; namely, hammers, putty knives, planes, saw, axes, hatchets, hack saws, sledge hammers, plaster trowels, cement trowels, pens, pencils, shovels, hoes, jack hammers and paint brushes for non artistic painters; (c) cutlery; namely, forks, knives and spoons; (all 3 as arthricic prosthetics), and for fillet knives and buck/hunting knives; (d) side arms; namely, pistols and hand guns | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 1992 |
| 028 | sporting articles; namely, baseball bats, softball bats, golf clubs, fishing poles, bicycle handlebars, motor cycle handlebars, racquetball racquets, tennis racquets, badminton racqyets, bar bells, dumb bells, water ski tow rope handle, ski poles, hunting knives, fillet knives, fishing knives, pole vaulting poles and the grip handle of an archery bow | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 1993 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 1993 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 1, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |