USPTO serial 74301459
ICARUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVY, MICHAEL S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ICARUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rockville, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barth X. deRosa
BARTH X DEROSA WATSON, COLE, GRINDLE & WATSONSTE 7251400 K ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-2477Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | computer software and user manuals sold therewith | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | educational services; namely, seminars and workshops on computer hardware and software systems | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | services; namely, the design, supply and maintenance of computer software and hardware; consulting services in the field of computer hardware and software; personalized training services; providing time/share access to computer management and data base systems | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 1994 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 28, 1993 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Aug 9, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |