USPTO serial 74302009
NEUTROGENA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CONN, WILLIAM A.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEUTROGENA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Michael Cleary
J MICHAEL CLEARY CLEARY & KOMEN600 PENNSYLVANIA AVE S ESTE 200WASHINGTON, DC 20003-4304Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | antiperspirants; deodorants; hair treatment products; namely, deep conditioning formulas, detangling mists/shampoos/conditioners, mud pack treatments, bath products; namely, body cream, facial mask; sun protection products; namely, sunblock gel and combination facial cleanser and toner | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | acne treatment products; namely, acne concealer, medicated oil-free moisturizer, medicated spray for treatment of body acne, face lotion for acne-prone skin, hydrocortisone scrub, and acne stick cleanser | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NEUTROGENA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by NEUTROGENA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named NEUTROGENA
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 1996 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 1996 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 1996 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 1995 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 1994 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 7, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 1994 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 24, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 2, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |