Drawing for BENCHMARKER

USPTO serial 74302383

BENCHMARKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEBER, BRIAN W
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BENCHMARKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Markus Brakhan

MARKUS BRAKHAN ESQP O BOX 5851BURLINGTON, VT 05402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016computer programs and instruction manuals sold as a unit for use in analyzing work flowABANDONEDSep 9, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 1994ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 16, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 1993IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jan 4, 1993AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 15, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 1992IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 27, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance