USPTO serial 74303070
TIMBER CREEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TIMBER CREEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Arlington Heights, IL
Arlington Heights, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James P. Ryther
JAMES P RYTHER ROCKEY, RIFKIN & RYTHERTWO FIRST NATIONAL PLZ20 S CLARK ST STE 2900CHICAGO, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | fishing boots; namely, rubberized thigh-high boots not for everyday or casual wear, and fishing waders; namely, rubberized chest-high waders | ABANDONED | Mar 7, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 1994 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 17, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 27, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |