USPTO serial 74303847
VIVIDA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIVIDA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lance J. Lieberman
LANCE J LIEBERMAN COHEN, PONTANI, LIEBERMAN & PAVANE551 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10176UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics containing fish oil; namely, skin lotions, skin creams, hair shampoos, skin tonics and skin cleansing creams | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | pharmaceuticals and natural preparations containing fish oil for external medical use for skin care and treatment of skin to avoid wrinkles and to strengthen the skin | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | edible oils consisting fish oil | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 9, 1996 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 21, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |