USPTO serial 74304671
GEORGES MARCIANO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GEORGES MARCIANO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Britton Light
Britton Light & Timothy Fuller MSKMarciano, Inc. / Georges Marciano1000 North Crescent DriveBeverly Hills, CA 90210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | bicycles, tricycles and wagons | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MSKMARCIANO, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GUESS ?, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Guess?, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Guess?, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MSKMARCIANO, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MSKMARCIANO, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named GEORGES MARCIANO
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 30, 1996 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 1996 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 1996 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 1996 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 15, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 13, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 3, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 18, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 1993 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 6, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |