USPTO serial 74305737
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas R. Leavens
THOMAS R LEAVENS MCBRIDE BAKER & COLES500 W MADISON ST 40TH FLCHICAGO, IL 60661UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software and user manuals sold as a unit for use in the area of compilling, formatting and analyzing sales information | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 1994 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 5, 1993 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jun 29, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 14, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |