Drawing for RADIANTPANEL

USPTO serial 74305777

RADIANTPANEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLE RICHARD G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RADIANTPANEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward A. Pennington

EDWARD A PENNINGTON MORGAN & FINNEGAN1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WSTE 960WASHINGTON, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011household hot water baseboard heatersABANDONEDNov 6, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 1997ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 8, 1997EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 8, 1997EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 8, 1997EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 8, 1997EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 8, 1996CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 15, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 1996EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 21, 1996EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 23, 1995CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 23, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 1994CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 7, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 21, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 1993ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 9, 1993CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Aug 20, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 7, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 23, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance