USPTO serial 74306068
BIONICHE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIONICHE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London, Ontario N6E 2V6, CA
London, Ontario N6E 2V6, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daiva K. Tautvydas
DAIVA K TAUTVYDAS JONES, ASKEW & LUNSFORD37TH FL191 PEACHTREE ST N EATLANTA, GA 30303-1769Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | pharmaceutical preparations; namely, therapeutics and preventatives for the treatment and prevention of cancer, arthritis, and various endocrine conditions | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 15, 1995 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 1995 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 13, 1995 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 1995 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 20, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 16, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |