USPTO serial 74306464
BOB TIMBERLAKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHAW, THOMAS V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BOB TIMBERLAKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CARLA C. CALCAGNO
CARLA C CALCAGNO FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT& DUNNER1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | furniture and decorative furnishings; namely, bedroom furniture, living room furniture, dining room furniture, kitchen furniture, office furniture, occasional furniture, tables, chairs, sofas, ottomans, loveseats, beds, headboards, footboards, cabinets, chests, cupboards, hutches, buffets, sideboards, benches, desks, entertainment centers; picture frames; wall decor; namely, signs and plaques; mirrors; pillows | ABANDONED | Feb 8, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 29, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 5, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 5, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 1994 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 6, 1994 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 4, 1993 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 28, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 22, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |