USPTO serial 74306875
MEAL MAKERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COHEN, DARREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MEAL MAKERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES K. BAUGHMAN
JAMES K BAUGHMAN LEGAL DEPTCAMPBELL SOUP COMPANYCAMPBELL PLCAMDEN, NJ 08103-1799Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | meat, poultry, fish, foul, and processed vegetables, used as ingredients for the preparation of entrees and side dishes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 3, 1995 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 3, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 3, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 15, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 27, 1993 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 21, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 19, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 7, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |