USPTO serial 74307298
KLEAN-STRIP GREEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2006458Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 8, 1996
- Examiner
- BAXLEY,ANDREW P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KLEAN-STRIP GREEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James B. McLaren, Jr.
JAMES B MCLAREN JR ARMSTRONG ALLEN PREWITT GENTRY, ET AL1900 ONE COMMERCE SQMEMPHIS, TN 38103-2568UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | paint thinners for industrial and residential use in thinning oil based paints and varnish, in cleaning brushes and degreasing tools and equipment; varnish thinners for industrial and residential use in thinning varnish; shellac thinners for industrial and residential use in thinning shellac; lacquer thinners for industrial and residential use in thinning lacquer; solvents and thinners for industrial and residential use; turpentine substitutes for use as a thinner and brush cleaner for oil based paints, varnish and stains; methyl ethyl ketone substitutes for use as a thinner, cleaner and remover for coatings such as polyurethane, paint and baked on enamel, resins and adhesives; xylene substitutes for use as a thinner of oil based paint, lacquer, varnish and adhesives; toluol substitutes for use as a thinner of oil based paint, lacquer, varnish and adhesives; naphtha substitutes for use as a thinner of oil based paint, lacquer, varnish and adhesives; metal conditioners for use in ensuring good adhesion of paint to treated metal surfaces and in inhibiting the formation of new rust under finishes on iron and steel; linseed oil for improving the flow and gloss of oil based paint and as a finish for natural wood which seals and protects; denatured alcohol for use in thinning shellac and cleaning brushes; and waterproofing sealer coatings for exterior use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2003 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 5, 1996 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 21, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 23, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 30, 1993 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 9, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 10, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |