USPTO serial 74307466
CINESITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARMINE, F. D.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CINESITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Schwab
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-4141UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | providing facilities; namely, studio space which includes specialized computers, scanners, and film recorders and proprietary software for use therewith used by others for the purpose of the creation and production of audio and visual effects | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | custom design of computer software in the area of digital imaging, image editing, digital compositing and special visual effects for motion imaging and technical consultation in the field of production and creation of audio and visual special effects | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 21, 1998 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 21, 1998 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 18, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 9, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 20, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 23, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 1993 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 23, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |