USPTO serial 74307980
TUBULAR ULTRASOUND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLE RICHARD G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TUBULAR ULTRASOUND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David R. Cragle
DAVID R CRAGLE LOOPER, REED, MARK & MCGRAWNINE GREENWAY PLZ STE 1717HOUSTON, TX 77046UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | portable and fixed ultrasonic tubular inspection equipment and components for use in testing metal-based tubular goods; namely, ultrasonic transducers; electronic ultrasonic processing, testing and monitoring components; namely, computer processors for processing ultrasonic transducer output, customized oscilloscopes and related monitoring unit, and hardware and software programs for processing ultrasonic transducer output; and pipe rolling and handling racks and tubular goods transports in the nature of conveyor systems to position, hold and turn tubulars being inspected by ultrasonic testing methods, such conveyor systems being sold as a unit with the foregoing described transducers, electronic processing, testing and monitoring components | ABANDONED | Dec 15, 1989 |
| 042 | ultrasonic and electro-magnetic tubular inspection services; namely, flaw detection and wall thickness variance measurement of metal-based tubular goods, both flexible and rigid, drill pipe, well pipe, and casing through non-destructive ultrasonic (sound-wave based testing) and electromagnetic (active or residual magnetic based testing) assessment | ABANDONED | Dec 15, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |