Drawing for HARLEQUIN

USPTO serial 74308195

HARLEQUIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEEGARS, GERALD C.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HARLEQUIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID A COHEN

DANA BREITMAN FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC6TH FL866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cosmetics, namely, face and body powders, eye brow, eye liner and lip liner pencils, nail polishes, lipsticks, rouges, perfumes, eau de cologne, foundation creams; toiletries, namely, anti-perspirants, hair shampoo, face, hand and body creams, skin soaps, non-medicated bath salts, makeup removing lotions, creams and liquids; not specifically for masquerade costumes or theatrical useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 24, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 16, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 17, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 17, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 17, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 5, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 14, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 7, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 15, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 23, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 21, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 14, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 29, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 1993CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 5, 1993ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 17, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 8, 1993CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 1, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 31, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance