Drawing for BOTOX

USPTO serial 74308779

BOTOX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VLCEK, TOMAS V
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOTOX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Benita K. Kichler

BENITA K KICHLER ALLERGAN, INC2525 DUPONT DRIRVINE, CA 92715UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042providing information derived from pharmaceutical research and development to ophthalmologists and neurologists in the form of speakers kits, brochures, booklets and monographsABANDONEDDec 18, 1991

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 30, 1993ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 2, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 9, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance