Drawing for CYBERWORLD

USPTO serial 74308901

CYBERWORLD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SARAI, BALDEV
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CYBERWORLD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward D. Peace

EDWARD D PEACE HODGSON, RUSS, ANDREWS, WOODS & GOODYEAR1800 ONE M & T PLZBUFFALO, NY 14203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer systems comprised of computer chips, computer cables, computer interface boards, computer monitors, and computer mother boards; computer peripheral devices; namely, computer disc drives and modems; computer software for use in the fields of multimedia; namely, production coordination of multimedia presentations and documents; virtual reality; creation and maintenance of bulletin boards; creation and management of databases; groupware; networking; graphics; namely, graphic design, production and control of graphic displays; voice recognition; voice messaging; voice sampling; sound sampling; video creation; video editing; video enchancement; distribution; namely, management of distribution of goods and services; marketing; namely, management of the marketing and information functions and systems of a business; electronic mail (E-mail); computer aided instruction for use by businesses to train their employees and clients; management and facilitation of seminars and conferences; computer aided instruction for use in the home for personalized tutoring in math, language, and sciences; authoring and writing; desktop publishing; office management; business management; home management; and heuristicsABANDONED
028computer game programs; computer game tapes; computer game cassettesABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 15, 1995ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 20, 1995EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Mar 3, 1995EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Oct 28, 1994EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Sep 14, 1994EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Apr 14, 1994EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 16, 1993EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 14, 1993NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 22, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 21, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 16, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 12, 1993CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Feb 8, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 30, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 20, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 16, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance