USPTO serial 74309764
PROLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITAKER, LAURIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter L. Costas
PETER L COSTAS PEPE & HAZARD225 ASYLUM STHARTFORD, CT 06103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | test kits comprised of reagents for determining swimming pool water chemistry and the amount of additives required; and kits for repairing vinyl swimming pool liners comprised of adhesives and vinyl patches | ABANDONED | — |
| 006 | metal hand operated reels for storing swimming pool covers and solar blankets | ABANDONED | — |
| 020 | non-metal hand operated reels for storing swimming pool covers and solar blankets; pool accessory hangers of synthetic resin | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NORTH AMERICAN MARKETING CORPORATION, THE
- Other trademarks owned by NORTH AMERICAN MARKETING CORPORATION, THE
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named PROLINE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 30, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 1994 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 15, 1994 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 21, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 20, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 15, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |