Drawing for ESSENTIALS

USPTO serial 74309824

ESSENTIALS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTLER, MIDGE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ESSENTIALS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Siegrun D. Kane

SIEGRUN D KANE KANE, DALSIMER, SULLIVAN, KURUCZ, ET AL711 THIRD AVE 20TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006metal plates used to repair puncture holes in wallsABANDONED—
008hand tools; namely, saws, chisels, files, hammers, screwdrivers, pliers, utility knives, planes, socket sets (comprised of ratchets and sockets), wrenches, squares, scrapers, nail sets for use in setting nails below the surface of wood, pry and ripping bars, blades, trowels, wire brushes, and metal plates used to repair puncture holes in walls, and parts thereforABANDONED—
009measuring instruments, namely tape rules, folding rules, levels, measuring wheels, measuring reels and chalk lines, safety gogglesABANDONED—
016paint brushes, paint application rollers, and parts therefor; wood poles used in painting; chalkABANDONED—
020plastic tool boxesABANDONED—
021wire brushes not being machine partsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 1996ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 21, 1996EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 18, 1995EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 3, 1995EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 26, 1995EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 27, 1994NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 4, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 2, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 26, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 18, 1994ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 12, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 4, 1994ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 22, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 4, 1994CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 1, 1994ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 11, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 5, 1994CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 29, 1993ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 18, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 18, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance