USPTO serial 74311150
AMERICA'S BEST BACKPACK COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 4, 1994
- Examiner
- KREBS, CATHERINE K.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AMERICA'S BEST BACKPACK COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ward Hill, MA
Ward Hill, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence M. Green
LAWRENCE M GREEN WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, PC600 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02210-2211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | backpacks; specialized backpacks; namely, day packs, frame packs, and ski packs; knapsacks; book bags; tote bags; duffle bags; garment bags for travel; briefcases and luggage | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 13, 1993 |
| 025 | men's, women's and children's clothing; namely, shirts, jackets, hats, gloves, and pants | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 13, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2001 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 4, 1994 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 3, 1994 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 6, 1994 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 22, 1994 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 20, 1994 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 21, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |