Drawing for CRISPY SNACK

USPTO serial 74311342

CRISPY SNACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRISPY SNACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT D HOVEY

ROBERT D HOVEY HOVEY WILLIAMS TIMMONS & COLLINS2405 GRAND BLVD STE 400KANSAS CITY, MO 64108-2519UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030marshmallow - based candy in the form of squaresABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 1999ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 1, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 1998UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
May 28, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 2, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 25, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 1996CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 6, 1995CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 7, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 1995CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 3, 1994CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 14, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 19941.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Sep 14, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance