USPTO serial 74312376
SNAP TIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARKS, MARTIN H.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SNAP TIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shawnee Mission, KS
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William B. Kircher
WILLIAM B KIRCHER KOKJER, KIRCHER, BOWMAN & JOHNSON2414 COMMERCE TWR911 MAIN STKANSAS CITY, MO 64105-2088Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | desk or table top storage units for containing miscellaneous items; namely, all-purpose portable storage containers | ABANDONED | Jun 16, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 1995 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 25, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 19, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 2, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |