USPTO serial 74313555
THE ONE PAGE SYSTEM INFOTRAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2056517Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 29, 1997
- Examiner
- CROWE, ROBERT J.
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE ONE PAGE SYSTEM INFOTRAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Rodgers Lunsford III
J RODGERS LUNSFORD III SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL LLPSTE 3100, PROMENADE II1230 PEACHTREE ST NEATLANTA, GA 30309-3592Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business management consulting services in the fields of management, reporting systems, and business culture | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 3, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 27, 2006 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 4, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 28, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 19, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |