Drawing for AIRCOM

USPTO serial 74314005

AIRCOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2127493Status 800Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 6, 1998
Examiner
MOORHEAD CORA ANN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with AIRCOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald E. Shapiro

Ronald E. Shapiro Shapiro and Silverstein PLLC11350 Random Hills Road, Suite 740Fairfax, VA 22030UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038mobile aeronautical satellite telecommunications servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2018NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2018RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jan 26, 201889AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jan 26, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 17, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 5, 2018E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2017REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 29, 2007RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Mar 29, 200789AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Mar 9, 2007PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Jan 31, 200789AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Jan 31, 2007E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2003C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 20, 2003815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Oct 20, 2003E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 1998R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 12, 1997CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Oct 17, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 1996SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 10, 1996IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 20, 1996EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 13, 1995EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 24, 1995EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 12, 1995EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 13, 1994NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 20, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 19, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 6, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 14, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 1993CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 27, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 16, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance