Drawing for STIG ERLANDER'S JUBILEE

USPTO serial 74315065

STIG ERLANDER'S JUBILEE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HINES, CARYN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STIG ERLANDER'S JUBILEE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CAROL L. SMITH

CAROL L SMITH SHELDON & MAK401 FLORENCE ST - 1ST FLPALO ALTO, CA 94301UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cleaning preparation; namely, skin soap, liquid soap for hands, face and body, laundry cleaning preparation, body powder and personal deodorantsABANDONEDAug 23, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 11, 1996ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 11, 1996EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 4, 1996EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 7, 1995CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 12, 1994CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 20, 1994EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 18, 1994JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 11, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 12, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 17, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 9, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance