USPTO serial 74315144
CATALYST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CATALYST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel L. Appelman
DENNIS D MILLER BUCHALTER, NEMER,FIELDS & YOUNGER333 MARKET ST 29TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2130UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | comprehensive nationwide electronic guide, contained on a computer disk, CD-ROM or other electronic media, of suppliers of consumer products and services, and articles, containing expert advice regarding such products and services, designed to help consumers make informed purchasing decisions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 7, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 16, 1994 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 17, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 15, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 2, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 1994 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 16, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 31, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |