USPTO serial 74315160
3DO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 3DO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Redwood City, CA
Redwood City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine Hunt Rundle
CATHERINE HUNT RUNDLE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COUNSEL, TRADEMARKTHE 3DO COMPANY600 GALVESTON DRREDWOOD CITY, CA 94063Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing; namely, tops, bottoms, sweatshirts, sweatpants, footwear, hosiery, pants, shorts, skirts, shirts, sweaters, dresses, coats, jackets, headwear, scarves, undergarments, swim wear, belts, neckwear, sleepwear, suits, vests, gloves, overalls, loungewear, costumes for adults or children, kerchiefs, warm-up suits | ABANDONED | May 19, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 28, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1997 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 1997 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 1996 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 1996 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 14, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 13, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 11, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 17, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 1993 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 2, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |