USPTO serial 74315161
3DO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 3DO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Redwood City, CA
Redwood City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine Hunt Rundle
CATHERINE HUNT RUNDLE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COUNSEL, TRADEMARKTHE 3DO COMPANY600 GALVESTON DRREDWOOD CITY, CA 94063Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services in the nature of amusement arcades; amusement centers or parks; educational services; namely, providing incentives to people and organizations to demonstrate excellence in the field of multimedia audio/visual entertainment and information systems through the issuance of awards; publication of books or magazines for entertainment or educational purposes; cable television or television show programming; recreational camps; rental of films, film projection equipment, multimedia audio/visual apparatus or accessories, movie studios or movie theatres; fan clubs; entertainment in the nature of competitions in the field of multimedia audio/visual entertainment and information or systems; arranging and conducting education conferences; production and/or distribution of motion pictures and records or master records; distribution of radio programs for others; production and/or distribution of television programs and/or closed caption television programs; development and dissemination of educational materials in the field of multimedia audio/visual entertainment and information systems; audio recording and production; videotape production; cable television programming; computer education training in the field of multimedia audio/visual entertainment and information systems, workshops, seminars or classes in the field of multimedia audio/visual entertainment and information systems | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 1997 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1996 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 1996 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 14, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 13, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 1993 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 12, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |