USPTO serial 74315402
ROCKY MOUNTAIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIGELL, CHARLES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROCKY MOUNTAIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Landau
DAVID M LANDAU5000 COLUMBIA SEAFIRST CTR701 FIFTH AVESEATTLE, WA 98104-7078Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 1995 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 7, 1994 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 7, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 7, 1994 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Sep 16, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 20, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 18, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 1992 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |