Drawing for QUALITY BY DESIGN

USPTO serial 74315465

QUALITY BY DESIGN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TAYLOR, CRAIG
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUALITY BY DESIGN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

K. Bradford Adolphson

K BRADFORD ADOLPHSON WARE FRESSOLA, ET ALBRADFORD GREEN, BLDG FIVE755 MAIN ST P O BOX 224MONROE, CT 06468

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041providing educational courses of instruction and training in the field of business managementABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 2, 1993ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Dec 2, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 9, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 3, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 28, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 28, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance