Drawing for RAMPAGE

USPTO serial 74315791

RAMPAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEBER, BRIAN W
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RAMPAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003perfume, eye shadow, lipstick, lip gloss, eye pencils, blush, nail polish, nail polish remover, wet and dry makeup foundation, mascara, skin, facial and body concealer, face and body powder, lip liner, eye make up remover, skin cleanser, skin toner, skin moisturizer, make up cases containing make up, cosmetic brush cases containing cosmetic brushes and non-medicated vitamin E balm in the form of a stick for application to the face, hands and bodyACTIVE—
021contour brush, larger powder brush, eye brow brush, lip brush, blush brush, eye shadow brush and make up spongesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 10, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 10, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 6, 2000EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 22, 2000EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 22, 1999EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 21, 1999EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 10, 1999EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 21, 1999EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 16, 1998EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 16, 1998EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 12, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 21, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 22, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 29, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 3, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 23, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 27, 1993CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 24, 1993DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 29, 1993CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 12, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 1993DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance