USPTO serial 74315881
3DO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 3DO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Redwood City, CA
Redwood City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine Hund Rundle
CATHERINE HUND RUNDLE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COUNSEL, TRADEMARKTHE 3DO COMPANY600 GALVESTON DRREDWOOD CITY, CA 94063Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing; namely, bottoms, sweatpants, footwear, hosiery, pants, shorts, skirts, sweaters, dresses, coats, jackets, scarves, undergarments, swim wear, belts, neckwear, sleepwear, suits, vests, gloves, overalls, loungewear, costumes, kerchiefs, shoestrings, warm-up suits | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 1997 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 1997 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 1996 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 1996 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 1996 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1995 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 27, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 12, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 11, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 13, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 1994 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 1993 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 2, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |