USPTO serial 74316896
CORINNA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CORINNA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Tsim Sha Tsui, Kowloon, HK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa Garono
LISA GARONO SKJERVEN, MORRILL, MACPHERSON, ET AL25 METRO DR STE 700SAN JOSE, CA 95110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | horological and other chronometric instruments, accessories and parts thereof; namely, clocks, parts for clocks, chronographs, parts for chronographs, watches, parts for watches, watch bands, watch cases, watch chains, watch fobs, watch straps and watch movements | ABANDONED | — |
| 018 | handbags, purses, wallets, key cases | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | sportswear; namely, jackets, bands, belts, caps, coverups, gloves, jackets, parkas, suits, leggings, leotards, shirts, sweat shirts, shorts, and pants, and visors; swimwear, shoes, athletic shoes, socks, underwear, and brassieres | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |