Drawing for INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

USPTO serial 74316920

INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Micah D. Stolowitz

MICAH D STOLOWITZ MARGER, JOHNSON, MCCOLLOM, ET AL650 AMERICAN BANK BLDG621 S W MORRISON STPORTLAND, OR 97205

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038computer communication services; namely, providing access to a computer system for communication among remote users, for remote use of application programs, and for simultaneous use, along with other remote users, of multi-user application programsABANDONED—
042computer services; namely, providing on-line access to remote users of computer software featuring games, entertainment and/or education applications programsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 1, 1995ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 31, 1995NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 31, 1994ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 25, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 14, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 7, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 1, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance