USPTO serial 74317077
A PROFESSIONAL SECURITY ALLIANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with A PROFESSIONAL SECURITY ALLIANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John E. Reilly
JOHN E REILLY REILLY AND PURCELL, PC1120 LINCOLN STSTE NO 1500DENVER, CO 80203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | professionally installed industrial and commercial on-site monitoring systems, closed circuit television apparatus comprising video cameras, video monitors, video recording display and imaging equipment, time/date generator, and access control apparatus comprising computer, printer, data display monitor, card readers, access cards, digital key pads, data gathering panels, software for operating on-site monitoring systems | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | connection with the professional installation and maintenance of industrial and commercial on-site monitoring equipment including closed circuit television apparatus and access control apparatus | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 1996 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 25, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 25, 1996 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 31, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 15, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |