USPTO serial 74317229
NAPA VALLEY GOURMET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 9, 1996
- Examiner
- FRONT, MITCHELL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NAPA VALLEY GOURMET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA
Pleasant Hill, CA
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald C. Feix
DONALD C FEIX241 N SAN MATEO DRSAN MATEO, CA 94401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | salsa | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2003 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 9, 1996 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 19, 1995 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 1995 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 1993 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 29, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |