USPTO serial 74317861
PLAYMATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLAYMATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa A. Tefend
LISA A TEFEND PLAYBOY ENTERPRISES, INC680 N LAKE SHORE DRCHICAGO, IL 60611UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | prophylactics, namely condoms | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 19, 1997 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 1997 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 1997 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 14, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 18, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 16, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 6, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 3, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 1994 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 24, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |