USPTO serial 74317953
------THE WORLD WITH MARCO POLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ------THE WORLD WITH MARCO POLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
1820 Montreux 2, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janet Gilbert Ricciuti
3735 CONCORD RDDOYLESTOWN, PA 18901UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | cruise ship services and arranging and conducting travel tours | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 1995 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 29, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |