USPTO serial 74318029
HR-NEWS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HR-NEWS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick J. Coyne
PATRICK J. COYNE GAVIN LAW OFFICES, PLC2500 Gaskins RoadRichmond, VA 23238UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed publications; namely, newspaper concerning the human resource industry | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 1995 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 1995 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 7, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 1993 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 1993 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 1993 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 8, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |