USPTO serial 74318056
QUENCH! IT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUENCH! IT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John O. Graybeal
ANDRE' W SOUANG NORTHERN PROFESSIONAL INC3611 S JUNEAU STSEATTLE, WA 98118UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | hair care products; namely, shampoos, conditioners, styling gels and sprays | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 17, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 8, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 8, 1994 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 12, 1994 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 24, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 20, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 2, 1993 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 19, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 3, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 21, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |