USPTO serial 74318210
DIAWAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1903272Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 4, 1995
- Examiner
- SCHULMAN, LORI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DIAWAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa M. DuRoss
LISA M DUROSS WEINTRAUB, DUROSS & BRADY30200 TELEGRAPH RD STE 444BINGHAM FARMS, MI 48025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | lapping paste, lapping compound, lapping slurry, micron powder and mesh gains for industrial use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | power operated diamond and boron nitrade tools; namely, grinding wheels, lapping tools, glass grinding, lapping and beveling tools, finishing tools, draw dies, inserts, hones, saws, cut off wheels, dressers, jig grinding pins, form wheels, and worm gear grinding wheels | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dianamic Abrasive Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Dianamic Abrasive Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Dianamic Abrasive Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named DIAWAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2002 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 4, 1995 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 10, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 1995 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 11, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 2, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 10, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 21, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 30, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 1993 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 19, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |