USPTO serial 74318395
MS. AMERICA'S CUP USA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHAW, THOMAS V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MS. AMERICA'S CUP USA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | boots, shoes, slippers, hats, headbands, scarves, neckties, ties, underwear, nightclothes, pajamas, shirts, blouses, foul weathered gear, parkas, T-shirts, tanktops, sweaters, sweatshirts, belts, gloves, pants, skirts, suits, dresses, tights, leggings, nylons, knee-highs, socks, booties, bibbers, sunglasses, coats, jackets, overalls, coverups, beachwear, swimwear, suspenders and sweatsuits | ABANDONED | Mar 13, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 26, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 26, 1997 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 28, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 4, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 16, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 1993 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Nov 30, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |