USPTO serial 74318480
RBM RELIABILITY BASED MAINTENANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CONN, WILLIAM A.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RBM RELIABILITY BASED MAINTENANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew S. Neely
ANDREW S NEELY LUEDEKA, HODGES, NEELY & GRAHAM, PC1030 FIRST AMERICAN CTR507 GAY STKNOXVILLE, TN 37902Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | instruments, equipment and software for use in determining the maintenance status of machinery and equipment; namely, microprocessor based monitors, data collectors and analyzers for collecting, storing and analyzing data relating to the maintenance status of machines; shaft alignment detectors and analyzers for monitoring the alignment status of mated shafts; monitors and analyzers for detecting and analyzing the balance of rotating machinery and equipment parts; instruments for analyzing and quantifying the lubricating characteristics of used lubricants; accelerometers, velocity and displacement probes, and thermal sensors; and computer programs for use in storing, analyzing and reporting maintenance data and generating maintenance status reports for machinery and equipment | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Computational Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Computational Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named RBM RELIABILITY BASED MAINTENANCE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 1994 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 11, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 28, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |