Drawing for U. S. ARMOR CORPORATION

USPTO serial 74318891

U. S. ARMOR CORPORATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEVINE, HOWARD B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with U. S. ARMOR CORPORATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sheridan Neimark

SHERIDAN NEIMARK BROWDY AND NEIMARK419 SEVENTH ST NW STE 300WASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040bullet proof vests, bullet proof shields and bullet proof plates; custom manufacture of bullet proof vests, bullet proof shields and bullet proof platesABANDONEDOct 3, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 9, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 13, 1994EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 20, 1994ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 20, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 31, 1994EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 18, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 26, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance