USPTO serial 74319237
NOFERE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JUDGE, CONNIE M.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NOFERE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pasadena, CA
Pasadena, CA
Pasadena, CA
Pasadena, CA
Pasadena, CA
Pasadena, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert L. Kovelman
ROBERT L KOVELMAN FULWIDER, PATTON, LEE & UTECHT10877 WILSHIRE BLVD TENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90024UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | multiaccess communication system; namely, electrical circuitry and digital software for incorporation in devices that transmit, receive and process electronic signals | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Zimmerman, George A.
- Other trademarks owned by Sotel, Phillip K.
- Other trademarks owned by Sotel, Phillip K.
- Other trademarks owned by Zimmerman, George A.
- Other trademarks owned by Posner, Edward C.
- Other trademarks owned by Posner, Edward C.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named NOFERE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 28, 1995 | EX2M | SOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 1995 | EX2D | SOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Feb 13, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 30, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 7, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 1992 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |