USPTO serial 74319333
MOET & CHANDON BRUT IMPERIAL CHAMPAGNE APPELLATION D'ORIGINE CONTROLEE EPERNAY FRANCE FONDE EN 1743 BRUT 1743
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 24, 1993
- Examiner
- COHEN, DARREN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MOET & CHANDON BRUT IMPERIAL CHAMPAGNE APPELLATION D'ORIGINE CONTROLEE EPERNAY FRANCE FONDE EN 1743 BRUT 1743?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
NEW YORK, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marie V. Driscoll
MARIE V DRISCOLL FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | champagne | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 27, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MOET HENNESSY USA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Schieffelin & Co.
- Other trademarks owned by Schieffelin & Co.
- Other trademarks owned by Schieffelin & Co.
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named MOET & CHANDON BRUT IMPERIAL CHAMPAGNE APPELLATION D'ORIGINE CONTROLEE EPERNAY FRANCE FONDE EN 1743 BRUT 1743
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 13, 2003 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 13, 2003 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 20, 2003 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 1999 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 30, 1999 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 1, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 2, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |