USPTO serial 74319498
BESO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BESO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew F. Jodziewicz
MATTHEW F JODZIEWICZ CHAN & JODZIEWICZ777 S FIGUEROA ST 34TH FLP O BOX 17576LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-0576Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics and cleaning preparations; namely, purifying gel, purifying cream cleanser, eye makeup remover, exfolliator, refining lotion, purifying lotion, skin conditoner, balancing complex lotion, face complex lotion (day and night creams), wrinkle cream, freckle cream, skin cream, moisture mask cream, clay face mask cream, eyelid cream, sun blocking or screening lotion, hair shampoo, hair conditoner and hair spray, mascara, scalp cream, scalp hair regrowing cream and eyebrow regrowing cream | ABANDONED | Mar 28, 1993 |
| 005 | vitamin, nutritional, and dietary supplements, and pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of stress | ABANDONED | Mar 28, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 1993 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| May 18, 1993 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 26, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |