Drawing for BOGOTA BAGS

USPTO serial 74319605

BOGOTA BAGS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOGOTA BAGS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark L. Sutton

MARK L SUTTON SHELDON & MAK225 S LAKE AVE NINTH FLPASADENA, CA 91101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018luggage and travel accessories; namely, carry-on bags, back packs and garment bags for travel and travel kits sold emptyABANDONEDAug 21, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 26, 1996EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 19, 1996ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 19, 1996EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 16, 1995CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 30, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 19, 1995CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 18, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 23, 1995NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
Mar 9, 1995CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 15, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 22, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 7, 1994ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 24, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 5, 1994CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 27, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 13, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 18, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance