USPTO serial 74319810
AT&T 800 CALL CENTER CONSULTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUDSON, BARBARA S.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AT&T 800 CALL CENTER CONSULTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R.A. Ryan
FRANK L POLITANO AT&T CORP900 RTE 202/206N P O BOX 752BEDMINSTER, NJ 07921UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational services; namely, conducting seminars in the field of telecommunications and consultation related thereto | ABANDONED | Jun 30, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AT&T CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named AT&T 800 CALL CENTER CONSULTING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 1994 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 26, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 24, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 25, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 2, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 29, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 30, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 24, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |